The cat is out of the bag! Shane
Warne's 50 greatest cricketers
http://tinyurl.com/27pcfhhttp://preview.tinyurl.com/27pcfh (A preview of the site, so that you know its not spam)
Well, looking at it from the outset, you find the names you'd see in any
contemporary list, (albeit in a quirky order that wouldn't please many critics or the statisticians) but
there are surprises, actually many, in store.
Sachin is at the top, pipping Lara by a tiny margin, which
Warne seems to say "makes a lot of difference". No surprises there, as
Warne has always held
Sachin in high esteem. And the list has all the
usual suspects, viz. Curtly,
Waqar,
Wasim, Border,
Mcgrath, The Waugh Brothers, "Tubby" Taylor,
Dravid,
Kumble etc.
But, the inclusion of certain unknown figures while overlooking some celebrated giants has raised a furore among the critics. Also, the placing awarded to some players gives room for debate.
Warney's 50 and 49 are two first-class cricketers, who have never played a single test. Some notable exclusions are
Inzamam and
Ganguly.
Well, first of all- I'm not going to go over the greatness of each player and his placing. Most of them are household names and the exact placing of each of them is subject one's own perspective. But, the one thing which we find weird is Steve Waugh's place- 26
th place? Behind Darren
Lehmann, and a few other blokes he captained?? Tim May, an off-spinner of mediocre talent who vanished into obscurity (honestly, how many times have you seen him bowl) with
Warne's rise is at 31st place ahead of
Waqar,
Kapil, Donald.
Many reasons can be attributed to Waugh's placing- and they're widely discussed in the following article in the
Agehttp://tinyurl.com/2xy29xhttp://preview.tinyurl.com/2xy29x (A preview of the site, so that you know its not spam)
I would also like to add my points to the theory posited in the
Age. Steve, although considered as a great, fighting batsman (NOBODY, NOT EVEN
WARNEY DENIES THAT) was not the best of captains even in Australia. He's got the longest streak of victories in Tests as a captain, but
Warne says that he was handed a wonderful team by Taylor (his predecessor). Besides, he wasn't a brave captain at any point of time in his career, unlike the present skipper
Ponting (which has earned
Ponting his nickname "Punter"). He wasn't able to stop batting assaults even though he had the best of bowlers at his disposal- The
Kolkata Turnaround,
Sachin's masterpieces at
Sharjah,
Aravinda's onslaught in the '96 WC final, the list is endless.
He was pretty tentative, and always played by the same strategy. And he was successful even in that one minded approach because he had people who always baled him out. How many times had Bevan saved the day? If not for
Warne's bowling in the semi-finals of the '99 WC, his own pompous boast to Gibbs about the dropped catch would've been laughed upon.
But, on the contrary, Stephen Fleming, with his motley group of bits-and-pieces cricketers has been able to produce more than creditable performances for quite a long time. And he took up the mantle when he was very young for the job, unlike Waugh. Martin
Crowe, considered one of the great thinking captains for his daring moves (like bringing on a spinner in the 2
nd over of the innings), especially in the '92 WC gets to 22
nd place (and
that's surely for his captaincy).
For so many of us who believe Steve was great,
Warne has given us food for thought. In fact, the whole list, however
quirky it is, has so much scope to be analysed on various perspectives. Apart from those included for personal reasons (like Tim May, Merv Hughes etc.) the rest of the lot and their respective placings need to interpreted correctly.
Warne's views are not to be lightly taken. He's someone known to frank, and sometimes telling bitter truths without mincing words. (Remember the time he spoke of coaches as being unnecessary?). So if you thought this was just for getting back into the limelight, think again.
Warne isn't the final say, but he opens up angles for narrow-minded cricket fans (like us Indians), and self-proclaimed experts of the game, for rigorous analysis.